Drawn vs. typed: which one to use, and when
A drawn signature is yours — unique motor patterns, natural variation, visually convincing on any document. Its weakness is hardware: a mouse produces a shakier line than the pen you have used your whole life. Two techniques close most of the gap: draw large (use the full canvas and let the export’s downscaling smooth the path), and draw fast — hesitant slow strokes wobble, confident quick ones look natural. On a phone or tablet, your finger or stylus makes this a non-issue.
A typed signature in a script font is the pragmatic alternative: instantly clean, perfectly repeatable, and entirely adequate for the places a signature is really a formality — email footers, internal approvals, newsletters. Its weakness is the opposite one: the same fonts are available to everyone, so it carries no identity. The honest rule: typed for decoration and flow, drawn for anything where the signature represents you.
Why the export is PNG and not JPG or SVG
JPG has no transparency — every JPG signature arrives inside a white rectangle that collides with shading, table borders, and dark themes. PNG’s alpha channel makes the background genuinely absent, and its lossless compression keeps stroke edges sharp where JPG’s block artifacts would fuzz them. SVG would in principle scale infinitely, but document tools (Word especially) handle embedded SVG inconsistently, and a 2×-resolution PNG survives every real-world insertion path. Practicality wins.
The workflow this tool anchors
The signature image is step one of a chain: Sign PDF places it onto contract pages with position and size control, the Invoice Generator gives freelance invoices a personal close, and for recurring use, keep the PNG in a notes app or password manager attachment — it is small, and regenerating an identical drawn signature is by definition impossible.